For years I’ve considered myself politically “left of center”; a progressive / liberal on social issues, pretty much a moderate on fiscal issues. I tend to support politicians who have reasonable positions on issues, regardless if they’re Democrats, Republicans or Independents. The current debate about whether or not the US committed acts of torture in the name of national security, however, has really made me rethink my political leanings.
As I’ve stated in the description of my website, I’m a political junkie. I watch the news every day on TV and online; When I read the newspaper, I always start with political stories; I listen to the news updates every hour on the radio; I talk to anyone and everyone who is willing to hear me out regarding politics. Lately, I’ve been shocked at the number of conservative commentators and pundits in the media who defend the United States’ use of torture, specifically waterboarding, on terror suspects beginning in 2002, and their support of those who conjured up our so-called “enhanced interrogation” program. The shock comes not only from the fact that it’s been proven time and time again throughout history that torture doesn’t really work, but from the apparently deeply held belief that the end justified the means in cases of waterboarding; the notion that torture was right as long as it worked and “kept us safe”.
What bothers me the most that these people are totally willing to deny facts and the historical record regarding torture in order to push their belief that torture is OK if the US does it. The facts are clear; we prosecuted Japanese soldiers after World War II for waterboarding US war prisoners. We prosecuted and convicted our own soldiers during the Vietnam War for waterboarding captive enemy soldiers. As recently as the 1980s we prosecuted and convicted a US sheriff in Texas for waterboarding prisoners. Waterboarding is categorized as torture since the 1890s and is considered a war crime by the Geneva Conventions, a document the US not only signed, but helped to draft. And yet, so many on the political right believe that because of what happened to the United States on 9 / 11, we are totally justified using torture techniques to extract information from our enemies, in the name of “protecting America”, an argument that totally contradicts what should define American society: the rule of law. According to the law, waterboarding and other forms of torture is a crime, and should not be done under any circumstances.
Regarding this issue, it has been those on the left who are so far on the correct side of the debate. Even those like Senator John McCain, who himself was subjected to waterboarding and other forms of torture during his captivity in Vietnam, has come out with the position that the US government should just sweep the issue under the rug, let bygones be bygones, and move forward, without at least an investigation of those who committed war crimes in the name of the United States. Based not only on this example of how conservatives in the US embrace this belief, and how progressives / liberals for the most part are for upholding the rule of law (there are certainly those who want prosecutions as some sort of political payback, but that’s a subject for another article), but on a host of other issues where conservatives are in my opinion on the wrong side of history, that I find my own political beliefs shifting even more to the left. Their current stance on torture makes them no different than those whom they claim we should be defending America against.
It could also be that I’ve been a straight-up liberal all along, but just didn’t want to admit it. However, when I think back on my time here in Europe and my political thinking in regard to German, British, Spanish and French politics, it’s been clear that I more often than not have supported left-leaning politicians and policies. It has to do with the fact that many aspects of liberal political philosophy just makes more sense to me. In America, for example, it’s common conservative wisdom nowadays that government cannot ever be that answer to society’s problems, because government is the problem. Given that a democratically elected government is chosen by the people and that we have the power to correct the so-called problem through the election process (which is, ironically, exactly what happened with the election of Barack Obama), this notion is fundamentally flawed. One could argue that, at least in the US, the government is now trying to clean up the problems we as citizens created, but that’s also the topic of another article.
At the end of the day, people should be interested in what’s true, right, and fair. The conservative movement in America represent neither of these values right now. The question is; when will the conservatives come back around to those principles that are supposed to define what their movement, let alone America, should be all about?
