<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Charles Simmons &#124; Adventures in La-La Land&#187;  &#8211; Charles Simmons | Adventures in La-La Land</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlessimmons.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlessimmons.com</link>
	<description>Chronicles of an American musician in exile</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 18:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Road Trip Recap: Old Timers And Moscow Madness</title>
		<link>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/04/11/road-trip-recap-timers-moscow-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/04/11/road-trip-recap-timers-moscow-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Last night's show...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natasha Ragozina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old timer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road trip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's boxing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlessimmons.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend’s road trip was an especially interesting one, for many reasons. I got to see some beautiful old (and new) cars, experience extreme sleep deprivation, and visited a city that had been considered the capital of “the evil empire” for most of my life. Here’s a recap of the 48 hour road trip that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://charlessimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Me_Moscow.jpg" rel="lightbox[370]"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-372" title="Me in Moscow" src="http://charlessimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Me_Moscow-225x300.jpg" alt="Me Moscow 225x300 Road Trip Recap: Old Timers And Moscow Madness" width="135" height="180" /></a>This weekend’s road trip was an especially interesting one, for many reasons. I got to see some beautiful old (and new) cars, experience extreme sleep deprivation, and visited a city that had been considered the capital of “the evil empire” for most of my life. Here’s a recap of the 48 hour road trip that took me to Essen, Germany and Moscow, Russia.<br />
<span id="more-370"></span><br />
Preparation for the coming adventure had begun a couple of weeks prior, when I received a call from my colleague and good friend <a href="http://www.worthydavis.com/" target="_blank">Worthy Davis</a>. He asked me if I could cover for him on a gig he was scheduled to do in Moscow. Normally I would immediately say yes to the chance to help out a colleague in a jam, but hearing the word “Moscow” admittedly gave me pause. As an American, one generally grows up with stereotypes of certain places and people; as an Army brat, those stereotypes are even stronger. When most Americans hear the words “Moscow” and “Russia” we immediately tend to think of communism, the Cold War, the arms race, and the enemy of everything America stands for. Since living in Europe, though, I’ve always been fascinated with going to the very country that my father has been trained to fight, so after thinking about it for about a few minutes, I agreed to do the job.</p>
<p>The first red flag went up as I was told that i had to send my passport to a travel agency to get my visa for Russia. I was always taught never to give my passport to anyone (US passports are hot commodities on the black market) but I gave my passport up after assurances from Worthy and the travel agent that I would get it back. After a week I got my passport back, stamped and ready. Once I got my tickets, I was ready to rock.</p>
<h3>Day 1: Essen</h3>
<p>I first took the train to Essen, a city in northwest Germany, where I was to perform at the Techno Classica, a convention for vintage and sports car enthusiasts. My client was the Volkswagen Autostadt, the exhibition hall and museum located at Volkswagen headquarters in Wolfsburg. The gig itself was not so spectacular (though we only played 1 set when we scheduled to play 3, which was fantastic), but the cars were amazing. I was genuinely surprised just how many luxury brands Volkswagen now owns; Bugatti, Bentley, Lamborghini, Audi and now Porsche all belong to Volkswagen. My favorite car was the Veyron 16.4, currently the fastest production sports car in the world.</p>
<p>As is usually the case, it’s very difficult to make a room full of mostly men to dance without putting strippers on stage, but the evening was still OK; our client was happy, so I was happy.</p>
<h3>Day 2: Moscow</h3>
<p>After only 1 hour of sleep I went to the train station and caught the ICE to Cologne, where I boarded my flight to Moscow. The flight itself was relatively short (two and a half hours across two time zones), but comfortable, since the plane was half empty (no one in their right mind flies anywhere at six in the morning). On arrival in Moscow, I got a bit nervous at passport control, being an American in Russia for the first time. However, I got through the control surprisingly fast. My colleague and I were picked up and were driven to our hotel, apparently the largest hotel in Moscow, where almost all foreign dignitaries stay when the visit the city. The Presidents Hotel is the only hotel in Moscow with security checkpoints (like a prison), but a very nice hotel nonetheless. We then were taken to the venue for soundcheck, driven back to the hotel to relax before the show. We performed at a party for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoA5y0u91jo" target="_blank">Natasha Ragozina</a>, undefeated super-middleweight champion in women’s boxing, a very tall, very strong, very beautiful woman who could kick your ass if necessary. <img src='http://charlessimmons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' title="Road Trip Recap: Old Timers And Moscow Madness" />  After a very chaotic but fun evening, it was off to the airport the next morning for the trip back home.</p>
<p>Here’s what I learned on my latest road trip :</p>
<h3>1. McDonalds really is everywhere.</h3>
<p><a href="http://charlessimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/McDonalds-russia.jpg" rel="lightbox[370]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-376 alignnone" title="McDonalds in Moscow" src="http://charlessimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/McDonalds-russia-300x197.jpg" alt="McDonalds russia 300x197 Road Trip Recap: Old Timers And Moscow Madness" width="240" height="158" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://charlessimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/McDonalds-russia.jpg" rel="lightbox[370]"></a></p>
<h3>2.Russian women are (for the most part) really beautiful. And tall.</h3>
<p>As I mentioned earlier, Americans grow up with many stereotypes about Russia and it&#8217;s people; specifically, our view of Russian women as being either huge (as in fat), pumped up on steroids, or otherwise unattractive. After this trip I can say that some of the most beautiful women I&#8217;ve seen to date are in Moscow. There&#8217;s a reason why many of today&#8217;s supermodels come from Russia.</p>
<h3>3. Rich Russians are the kings of bling.</h3>
<p>In the span of about 2 hours, I saw 4 stretch Hummers, a ridiculous number of black SUV&#8217;s and limousines with armed (sometimes police) escorts, champagne en masse, and more excess than I care to talk about. Russians are right up there with Americans in terms of unabashedly showing off their wealth. No wonder why Moscow is consistently ranked as one of the most expensive city in the world.</p>
<h3>4. The air in Moscow is disgusting, but the streets are very clean.</h3>
<p>I expected the air to be nasty; I got off of the plane and could literally taste the city (eww!). I was pleasantly surprised by how clean the streets were, however. Pretty amazing considering that Moscow&#8217;s population is over 10 million people.</p>
<h3>5. Driving in Moscow is an exercise in courage. Walking even more so.</h3>
<p>I honestly don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever been more terrified of driving in any other city I&#8217;ve been to as I was in Moscow. Traffic signs? What traffic signs?!?</p>
<h3>6. Yes, there ARE black Russians!</h3>
<p>Chalk this observation up to another one of those stereotypical American views. I saw quite a few Russians of African descent, Africans speaking fluent Russian, as well as Asians and other &#8220;non-white&#8221; Russians. Russia is of course a huge country, so it shouldn&#8217;t have surprised me; it was just interesting to see.</p>
<h3>7. America and Russia are not as different as most Americans and Russians may think.</h3>
<p>Of course there are cultural differences, and it&#8217;s impossible to judge after only being in one city for one day, but it was obvious to see that Russians have many of the same hopes, dreams and problems as Americans do. We all send our kids to school, think about the future, are proud of who we are, and want the best for ourselves and our families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/04/11/road-trip-recap-timers-moscow-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009: What I Learned, What&#8217;s Ahead in 2010</title>
		<link>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/01/06/2009-learned-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/01/06/2009-learned-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year in review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlessimmons.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look back at the past year, the events that shaped the year for me, and what I learned from the experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 was an interesting year in many ways, especially in the worlds of politics and entertainment (my two favorite subjects). We witnessed the passing of entertainment legends like Michael Jackson, Farrah Fawcett, Patrick Swayze and Les Paul; the resurgence of Jay-Z and dance music; the rise of Lady Gaga and the fall of Tiger Woods; iPhone, Facebook and Twitter mania; the rise of the internet as a primary news source coinciding with the rapid decline of newspapers and print publications. America witnessed it’s first year with a black president, followed by an unprecedented effort to discredit, demean and delegitimize him from the political right-wing. Revolution in Iran, pirates in Somalia, diplomacy at work in North Korea, a global recession and an escalation of war in Afghanistan all laid the foundation for what could be coming in 2010. The question is: what have we learned from 2009?. Here’s a list of things I learned in the past year, and what I hope to achieve in 2010.<br />
<span id="more-308"></span><br />
<strong>Basis For Reflection</strong></p>
<p>The events of 2009 has forced me to take a hard look at my life, my business and my future. 2008 was the year I started teaching, something I’d always talked about doing, but was frankly too scared to put into practice. Somehow I overcame my fear and now, after a full year of giving classes and workshops, I’ve realized that teaching is something that I really enjoy doing. The challenge of explaining my concepts of making music to students of all skill levels gives me a satisfaction that I wasn’t really prepared for. I’m glad I took up the challenge.</p>
<p>2009 was also the year I met two of my musical heroes, jazz keyboard player <a href="http://www.lorber.com/">Jeff Lorber</a> and Jean-Paul “Bluey” Maunick of the legendary UK jazz / soul band <a href="http://www.incognito.org.uk/">Incognito</a>. To watch these two masters at work really helped me put my own musical aspirations back into focus. I also met some extremely talented musicians during not only my regular teaching gig at the Popakademie, but also as a guest instructor at the Academy of Music in Dinkelsbühl, where I had the pleasure of performing with my good friend Alex Auer for the first time in 4 years. I’ve worked with some fantastic musicians, writers and producers in 2009, both on stage and studio.</p>
<p>Less fantastic in 2009 was the saga of my rock band iO; though we started out the year with a kick-ass live concerts in Rabenau and Brno in the Czech Republic, the future of the band was placed in doubt as my bandmates informed me that they were reforming their old band Guano Apes to play a series of european festivals in the summer. When their tour was over, they informed me that they were going to work on a new CD as Guano Apes, which will all but kill the prospects of a future iO CD. That’s really a shame, since iO has such potential. However, we’re hopeful that we can come together some time this year to make music together&#8230; </p>
<p><strong>So, what have I learned from 2009?</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;which brings me to my list of things that I learned from 2009. I’ve always been a believer in the notion that one can always learn something out of any situation, no matter if it’s positive or negative. So, given all that I’ve experienced in ’09, heres my list of wisdom:</p>
<p>1. The show must indeed go on.</p>
<p>2. NEVER take things for granted.</p>
<p>3. Seeing life through only one lens is never a good thing.</p>
<p>4. If you think you’ve had too much, you probably have.</p>
<p>5. Sometimes, doing stuff you’ve always dreamed of doing is fantastic. Sometimes, it’s not.</p>
<p>6. Get your mind right, and the rest will take care of itself.</p>
<p>7. If it takes more than three days to write a song, something’s wrong with the song. Not always, though.</p>
<p>8. Not everything that tastes good is good.</p>
<p>9. The best thing about new things is that they sometimes help you to appreciate the old things.</p>
<p>10. Kids grow fast.</p>
<p>11. Making a plan and sticking to it are two TOTALLY different things.</p>
<p>12. The phrase “don’t hate the player; hate the game” is just as relevant now as it was in the early ‘90s.</p>
<p>13. Though you may be better than most people at what you do, there is ALWAYS someone who is better than you.</p>
<p>14. When two grown people of completely different viewpoints can’t have a civil conversation about anything, NOTHING will get done.</p>
<p>15. We don’t appreciate what we have until it’s gone.</p>
<p>16. Going to bed angry sucks.</p>
<p>17. Fighting (in a relationship) can be good.</p>
<p>18. Sometimes, it’s better to just shut the f*ck up.</p>
<p>19. We all need balance in our lives.</p>
<p>20. It’s never too late to be the “you” you’ve always wanted to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charlessimmons.com/2010/01/06/2009-learned-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy Of A Hit: Pop Music Dissected</title>
		<link>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/11/21/anatomy-hit-pop-music-dissected/</link>
		<comments>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/11/21/anatomy-hit-pop-music-dissected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superstar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timbaland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlessimmons.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of what they actually say their reasons for making music are for, All aspiring musicians want to be stars. The dream of stardom has been the fuel for many a music career for hundreds of years; Mozart and Michael Jackson are in that respect not as different as one would think, issues of respective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of what they actually say their reasons for making music are for, <em>All aspiring musicians want to be stars</em>. The dream of stardom has been the fuel for many a music career for hundreds of years; Mozart and Michael Jackson are in that respect not as different as one would think, issues of respective talent and taste aside. All current and past pop music stars have one thing in common, though: a hit song that propelled them into pop stardom. The question that has haunted many songwriters and musicians since the dawn of popular music is: what makes a song a hit?<br />
<span id="more-295"></span><br />
I’ve had the privilege of working with many artists, producers and songwriters over the years who have created million-selling albums and singles, as well as hugely successful commercial jingles, and the one thing that always fascinated me was how they were able to make their songs such that people would pay enough attention to want them. I’ve learned that it’s not magic, nor is it rocket science to create a hit song. I’m not talking about the obvious marketing strategies and constant media bombardment that play a major role in making a song a hit (or in the case of the Internet, the effect of viral marketing), nor the incredible amount of luck, good timing and a generous dose of star power that also play vital roles. My fascination lies with the <em>structure</em> of a hit song; how must a song <em>sound</em> in order to be considered a hit by the media and the public?  </p>
<p>An example of hit song making is one of the biggest hits of 2007: “Apologize” from the band One Republic. There are two versions of the song; the original version which appears on their album “Dreaming out Loud”, and the remix version, produced by (now) legendary super-producer Tim “Timbaland” Mosley which appeared on his “Shock Value” album. The interesting thing for me is that the Timbaland version ended up being the “hit”, since the original version of the song is musically far superior to the remix version. here’s my analysis of why Timbaland’s version is more “hit worthy” compared to the original:</p>
<p><strong>1. It’s simple.</strong></p>
<p>In listening to the album version of “Apologize”, there are lots of little things (the cello opening in the beginning, the spacious nature of the arrangement, the interaction of the different instruments, the overall mix of the song) that make the song musically pleasing to my ear. By comparison, the Timbaland version is reduced to it’s “core” sound elements: Bass, beat (including human beatbox-enhanced rhythm effects), piano, vocals, and some synth effects. By stripping out the musically pleasing but superfluous elements of the song, the remix version is more accessible to a wider listening audience.</p>
<p><strong>2. It’s complexly monotonous.</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned in example one, the original version of “Apologize” contains very subtle interactions between particular instruments: the cellos play harmoniously with the piano, the beat is very sparsely programmed, giving the other instruments and vocals more space, allowing for more musical movement. In Timbaland’s version, the dominant theme in the track is the drum groove which, while complex in structure (again, the human beatbox effects combined with the main beat is a Timbaland signature production technique), is extremely monotonous, almost hypnotic in nature. A hit song always has a mesmerizing effect on the listener.</p>
<p><strong>3. It’s short.</strong></p>
<p>The original version of Apologize clocks in at 3:28 minutes. The remix version is 3:04. The vast majority of today’s hit music clocks in at under 3:30, mainly in order to be radio friendly (by allowing radio stations to have more time for commercials), but psychologically to create a sense of wanting more in the listener. </p>
<p><strong>4. It has a chorus AND a “hook”.</strong></p>
<p>One of the questions aspiring songwriters have asked since the beginning of pop music is &#8220;what&#8217;s the difference between a &#8216;chorus&#8217; and a &#8216;hook&#8217; in a pop song?&#8221; The simple explanation is this: the <em>chorus</em> is the part of the song that gives the song it’s lyrical / melody recognition; in other words, it’s the repetitive part of the song everyone eventually will sing, hum, or whistle along to. The <em>hook</em> is the part of the song that immediately grabs the listeners attention (it “hooks” the listener into the song). The hook can be a sung melody, an instrumental line, or a musical effect; it’s the thing the makes a listener go, “Aaah, I know that song!” In the case of Timbaland’s “Apologize” there are multiple hooks; the piano intro, Timbaland’s signature  “ehh &#8211; eh &#8211; eh” vocal riff, and the chorus itself. A true hit song has both a strong chorus and one or more hooks, and in many cases the chorus is the hook. Both concepts are designed to grab attention and hold onto it. </p>
<p><strong>5. It has one or more gimmicks.</strong></p>
<p>This aspect of hit songwriting relates directly to the previous point; all hit songs have a gimmick or “ear worm”, an element that makes it stand out from the rest of the pop music pack. The gimmick in Timbaland’s version is his signature vocal riff, which doesn’t appear in the album version of “Apologize”. A gimmick can be anything, from the sublte to the obvious; a guitar riff (“Walk This Way” by Aerosmith or “My Girl” by the Temptations), a drum groove (“Billie Jean” by Michael Jackson), a synth melody (“SexyBack” by Justin Timberlake or “Clocks” by Coldplay) or the song itself (belgian pop star Milow’s version of “Ayo Technology” by 50 Cent, performed with acoustic guitar). The next time you catch yourself whistling a song you just heard on the radio that you swear that you hate (we’ve all done this at one time or another), ask yourself; why is this song in my head? More than likely due to the song’s use of gimmicks.</p>
<p>Sadly, we live in a culture of disposable media, as evidenced by the incredibly short life span of a hit pop song, blockbuster movie, or popular video game. there’s lots of fierce competition for consumer’s money, so songwriters and other creative types must pull out all the stops to grab the most attention for their wares. A little understanding of how the formula of making hit music works goes a long way towards helping aspiring artists further realize their dream of superstardom. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/11/21/anatomy-hit-pop-music-dissected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Far-Right: Guerilla Racism</title>
		<link>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/09/29/american-farright-guerilla-racism/</link>
		<comments>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/09/29/american-farright-guerilla-racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlessimmons.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcolm X once said, “I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, than for one who comes to me as an angel, but is nothing but a devil.” Powerful words that best describe the current situation in 21st century America; a phenomenon that has been quietly built by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malcolm X once said, “I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, than for one who comes to me as an angel, but is nothing but a devil.” Powerful words that best describe the current situation in 21st century America; a phenomenon that has been quietly built by the American far-right since the late 80’s and has come to a head with the election of Barack Obama, permeating not only the right-wing media but the mainstream media as well. This phenomenon is something I like to call “guerilla racism”.<br />
<span id="more-272"></span><br />
Guerilla racism is comprised of a number of tactics, all of which are currently being directed at President Obama, but have far-reaching implications in American race relations. From comparing Obama to Hitler (anecdotally, most Europeans I know &#8211; especially Germans &#8211; find this sickening and hilarious at the same time) to branding him a communist and a socialist; from bring loaded weapons to events where he is speaking to the continuous questions regarding his citizenship; from the ongoing guilt-by-association campaign regarding ACORN and Reverend Jeremiah Wright to the ridiculous claims by right-wing media stars like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity that he’s somehow a racist. For many, the obvious question is: would all of this be happening if Obama wasn’t black? Yet as soon as those who put forward such racially tinged rhetoric are called out on their actions, they push back against the claims of racism with the anger, confusion and naiveté of a child whose hand was caught in a cookie jar, followed by a vigorous defense of their incitement. </p>
<p>It is this pattern of innuendo and subtle race-baiting followed by wild-eyed confusion and denial that is the essence of guerilla racism. Such hit-and-run tactics are vital to cause of stoking fear and anger within a certain portion of the American population who long for a return to the America of old; a demographic of white, conservative “christians” who have seen there ranks dwindle in what is becoming an ever more culturally diverse country. Being labelled a racist in 21st-century America is in many ways political and cultural suicide, so to engage in such demonization is an effective, more sinister way of fueling racial animosity.</p>
<p>Many on the political right have made the bizarre claim that it is those on the left and members of the so-called “liberal media” who are fanning the flames of racial hatred by associating any and all criticism of President Obama as racism. Such a notion couldn’t be further from the truth, however; the President gets plenty of criticism from the left, the current health care debate and Obama’s refusal to fight for a public option or his refusal to prosecute Bush administration officials regarding torture being an example. The difference is that the current criticism coming from the right is almost completely lacking in rationality, coming only as a means to score political points against Obama. There is also a startling amount of violence in the rhetoric coming from the right, which was recently called attention to by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Her words (which were promptly and expectedly attacked by the right-wing media) made a point that shouldn’t be lost on any American who knows about our turbulent history: When rhetoric coming from the right is this vitriolic, political violence is inevitable. Our flag has more than once been stained by violence caused by a right-winger who took conservative rhetoric a little too seriously. </p>
<p>So, how does Malcolm X’s famous quote apply to racism in 21st century America? Simple: the guerilla racism occurring today can be given an alternate name: cowardice. To be a racist in America today takes courage, and those who would fan the flames of racism through these subtle and dishonest tactics show just how much courage they lack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/09/29/american-farright-guerilla-racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP, racism and the “Birther” movement: circling the bowl?</title>
		<link>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/08/02/gop-racism-birther-movement-circling-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/08/02/gop-racism-birther-movement-circling-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Keyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president of the united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlessimmons.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a lot going on in the world of US politics that I could comment on; the health care debate, the ongoing Dick Cheney-CIA-torture saga, Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination, etc. However, two specific topics have seriously captured my attention in the last few weeks and have compelled me to comment on them; the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot going on in the world of US politics that I could comment on; the health care debate, the ongoing Dick Cheney-CIA-torture saga, Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination, etc. However, two specific topics have seriously captured my attention in the last few weeks and have compelled me to comment on them; the so-called “birther” movement, and the notion that Barack Obama is a racist, two theories that are dominating the right-wing media machine and Republican politics, both started by the radical fringe of the Conservative movement. Has the GOP been taken over by the lunatics, and will this takeover kill this once great political institution?<br />
<span id="more-261"></span><br />
According to a <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/31/760087/-Birthers-are-mostly-Republican-and-Southern">recent poll,</a> only 42% of Republicans believe that President Obama was born in the US, with the remaining 58% believing he’s not a natural born US citizen or are “unsure” of his status. Think about that for a moment. 58% of Americans who call themselves “Republican” (rather, Republicans who call themselves American) believe that our democratically elected president &#8211; who won 53% of the popular vote and utterly destroyed John McCain in the electoral college vote by an almost 2 to 1 margin &#8211; is not eligible to be the president because he was not born in the US, although there is overwhelming evidence that he was born in Hawaii. Unfortunately, many Republican politicians, mainstream media figures like <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907310039">CNN’s Lou Dobbs</a> and many at the Fox News channel are either buying into this nonsense or supporting (and promoting) it as reality and calling for Obama to “release his birth certificate”, despite the fact that his birth certificate <em>can be seen in detail by anyone on the internet</em>, as well as the announcement of his birth printed in the August 13th, 1961 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser. Don’t believe me? <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html">See for yourself</a>.</p>
<p>The notion that Obama isn’t a natural born citizen of the US is wrong on so many levels,<br />
and is so easy to disprove. As the father of two biracial children born on foreign soil (Germany) to a non-American mother, I can tell you with absolute certainty that even though Obama’s father wasn’t American, Obama has automatic US citizenship <strong>because his mother was a US citizen</strong>, regardless if she was under 18 when she had him. It also does not matter where he was born; as long as his mother did not renounce her citizenship, he is a natural born American citizen. Period. A child does not automatically lose their US citizenship when they are adopted by a non-US citizen (as was the case when Obama was legally adopted by his Indonesian stepfather), since <em>citizenship</em> and <em>custody</em> are two totally separate issues. The fascinating irony of the whole subject of Obama’s birth certificate is that it was brought about by a woman named Orly Taitz, a laywer and dentist living in California <strong>who herself isn’t a natural-born US citizen, but born and raised in the former Soviet republic of Moldova</strong>. </p>
<p>In her arguments against Obama she places great emphasis on the fact that his father wasn’t a US citizen, not realizing that in the US, as opposed to other countries, priority is not given to the father’s birth origin over the mother’s; even if Obama was born in Kenya, as the “birthers” believe,<em> he would still be considered a natural-born US citizen because of his mother</em>. I guess she also forgot that even if both of Obamas’ parents were illegal aliens, he’d <em>still </em>be a natural-born citizen because he was born in Hawaii (a fact that has now been confirmed twice by Hawaii state officials).</p>
<p>What makes the “birthers” so fascinating and disturbing is the general makeup of the part of the US population who are believers in the movement: older, white Southerners. Ironically, this is the demographic that makes up much of what is left of modern Republican Party base. Sadly, this movement speaks to a much bigger problem facing the GOP; the changing racial makeup of the US and the inability of many Republicans to deal with it. The “birther” movement is most definitely immersed in racial politics, despite having Alan Keyes as a vocal supporter. Keyes, who is black, was overwhelmingly defeated in his bid for the US Senate representing Illinois in 2004 by &#8211; you guessed it &#8211; Barack Obama. Shockingly, many Republican leaders are of the belief that this kind of race-based politics will work well for them in the upcoming 2010 and 2012 elections, although the election of 2008 proved that exactly the opposite is true. The most obvious sign of GOP racial politics is the opposition among conservatives of Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor. At face value, the notion that Sotomayor shouldn’t be appointed to the court because she’s a so-called “reverse racist” is just plain silly, especially given that she’s more experienced as a judge than anyone else currently sitting on the court. That coupled with the latest imagined controversy on the right regarding Obama’s comments on the arrest of a black Harvard professor in his own home by a white police officer, with several prominent right-wing media celebrities calling the President a racist because of the remarks, and you can start to see a pattern of racial division being instigated by the right wing. Fortunately, America is changing in its views about race: the 2000’s are definitely not the 1970’s. The GOP has in the “birther” movement and its outdated, failed race-baiting strategy a serious problem going forward, especially given that they need African-Americans and Latinos if they ever want to win elections in a meaningful way in the future.</p>
<p>With only <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/Party-Affiliation.aspx">26% of Americans calling themselves Republicans</a>, The last thing the GOP needs right now is a complete takeover by the lunatic right. They’re circling the bowl, and if they don’t take the right steps to stop the madness coming from the far right of their party, there will be no stopping the flush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charlessimmons.com/2009/08/02/gop-racism-birther-movement-circling-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->