Malcolm X once said, “I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, than for one who comes to me as an angel, but is nothing but a devil.” Powerful words that best describe the current situation in 21st century America; a phenomenon that has been quietly built by the American far-right since the late 80’s and has come to a head with the election of Barack Obama, permeating not only the right-wing media but the mainstream media as well. This phenomenon is something I like to call “guerilla racism”.

Guerilla racism is comprised of a number of tactics, all of which are currently being directed at President Obama, but have far-reaching implications in American race relations. From comparing Obama to Hitler (anecdotally, most Europeans I know – especially Germans – find this sickening and hilarious at the same time) to branding him a communist and a socialist; from bring loaded weapons to events where he is speaking to the continuous questions regarding his citizenship; from the ongoing guilt-by-association campaign regarding ACORN and Reverend Jeremiah Wright to the ridiculous claims by right-wing media stars like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity that he’s somehow a racist. For many, the obvious question is: would all of this be happening if Obama wasn’t black? Yet as soon as those who put forward such racially tinged rhetoric are called out on their actions, they push back against the claims of racism with the anger, confusion and naiveté of a child whose hand was caught in a cookie jar, followed by a vigorous defense of their incitement.

It is this pattern of innuendo and subtle race-baiting followed by wild-eyed confusion and denial that is the essence of guerilla racism. Such hit-and-run tactics are vital to cause of stoking fear and anger within a certain portion of the American population who long for a return to the America of old; a demographic of white, conservative “christians” who have seen there ranks dwindle in what is becoming an ever more culturally diverse country. Being labelled a racist in 21st-century America is in many ways political and cultural suicide, so to engage in such demonization is an effective, more sinister way of fueling racial animosity.

Many on the political right have made the bizarre claim that it is those on the left and members of the so-called “liberal media” who are fanning the flames of racial hatred by associating any and all criticism of President Obama as racism. Such a notion couldn’t be further from the truth, however; the President gets plenty of criticism from the left, the current health care debate and Obama’s refusal to fight for a public option or his refusal to prosecute Bush administration officials regarding torture being an example. The difference is that the current criticism coming from the right is almost completely lacking in rationality, coming only as a means to score political points against Obama. There is also a startling amount of violence in the rhetoric coming from the right, which was recently called attention to by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Her words (which were promptly and expectedly attacked by the right-wing media) made a point that shouldn’t be lost on any American who knows about our turbulent history: When rhetoric coming from the right is this vitriolic, political violence is inevitable. Our flag has more than once been stained by violence caused by a right-winger who took conservative rhetoric a little too seriously.

So, how does Malcolm X’s famous quote apply to racism in 21st century America? Simple: the guerilla racism occurring today can be given an alternate name: cowardice. To be a racist in America today takes courage, and those who would fan the flames of racism through these subtle and dishonest tactics show just how much courage they lack.

There was a lot going on in the world of US politics that I could comment on; the health care debate, the ongoing Dick Cheney-CIA-torture saga, Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination, etc. However, two specific topics have seriously captured my attention in the last few weeks and have compelled me to comment on them; the so-called “birther” movement, and the notion that Barack Obama is a racist, two theories that are dominating the right-wing media machine and Republican politics, both started by the radical fringe of the Conservative movement. Has the GOP been taken over by the lunatics, and will this takeover kill this once great political institution?

According to a recent poll, only 42% of Republicans believe that President Obama was born in the US, with the remaining 58% believing he’s not a natural born US citizen or are “unsure” of his status. Think about that for a moment. 58% of Americans who call themselves “Republican” (rather, Republicans who call themselves American) believe that our democratically elected president – who won 53% of the popular vote and utterly destroyed John McCain in the electoral college vote by an almost 2 to 1 margin – is not eligible to be the president because he was not born in the US, although there is overwhelming evidence that he was born in Hawaii. Unfortunately, many Republican politicians, mainstream media figures like CNN’s Lou Dobbs and many at the Fox News channel are either buying into this nonsense or supporting (and promoting) it as reality and calling for Obama to “release his birth certificate”, despite the fact that his birth certificate can be seen in detail by anyone on the internet, as well as the announcement of his birth printed in the August 13th, 1961 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser. Don’t believe me? See for yourself.

The notion that Obama isn’t a natural born citizen of the US is wrong on so many levels,
and is so easy to disprove. As the father of two biracial children born on foreign soil (Germany) to a non-American mother, I can tell you with absolute certainty that even though Obama’s father wasn’t American, Obama has automatic US citizenship because his mother was a US citizen, regardless if she was under 18 when she had him. It also does not matter where he was born; as long as his mother did not renounce her citizenship, he is a natural born American citizen. Period. A child does not automatically lose their US citizenship when they are adopted by a non-US citizen (as was the case when Obama was legally adopted by his Indonesian stepfather), since citizenship and custody are two totally separate issues. The fascinating irony of the whole subject of Obama’s birth certificate is that it was brought about by a woman named Orly Taitz, a laywer and dentist living in California who herself isn’t a natural-born US citizen, but born and raised in the former Soviet republic of Moldova.

In her arguments against Obama she places great emphasis on the fact that his father wasn’t a US citizen, not realizing that in the US, as opposed to other countries, priority is not given to the father’s birth origin over the mother’s; even if Obama was born in Kenya, as the “birthers” believe, he would still be considered a natural-born US citizen because of his mother. I guess she also forgot that even if both of Obamas’ parents were illegal aliens, he’d still be a natural-born citizen because he was born in Hawaii (a fact that has now been confirmed twice by Hawaii state officials).

What makes the “birthers” so fascinating and disturbing is the general makeup of the part of the US population who are believers in the movement: older, white Southerners. Ironically, this is the demographic that makes up much of what is left of modern Republican Party base. Sadly, this movement speaks to a much bigger problem facing the GOP; the changing racial makeup of the US and the inability of many Republicans to deal with it. The “birther” movement is most definitely immersed in racial politics, despite having Alan Keyes as a vocal supporter. Keyes, who is black, was overwhelmingly defeated in his bid for the US Senate representing Illinois in 2004 by – you guessed it – Barack Obama. Shockingly, many Republican leaders are of the belief that this kind of race-based politics will work well for them in the upcoming 2010 and 2012 elections, although the election of 2008 proved that exactly the opposite is true. The most obvious sign of GOP racial politics is the opposition among conservatives of Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor. At face value, the notion that Sotomayor shouldn’t be appointed to the court because she’s a so-called “reverse racist” is just plain silly, especially given that she’s more experienced as a judge than anyone else currently sitting on the court. That coupled with the latest imagined controversy on the right regarding Obama’s comments on the arrest of a black Harvard professor in his own home by a white police officer, with several prominent right-wing media celebrities calling the President a racist because of the remarks, and you can start to see a pattern of racial division being instigated by the right wing. Fortunately, America is changing in its views about race: the 2000’s are definitely not the 1970’s. The GOP has in the “birther” movement and its outdated, failed race-baiting strategy a serious problem going forward, especially given that they need African-Americans and Latinos if they ever want to win elections in a meaningful way in the future.

With only 26% of Americans calling themselves Republicans, The last thing the GOP needs right now is a complete takeover by the lunatic right. They’re circling the bowl, and if they don’t take the right steps to stop the madness coming from the far right of their party, there will be no stopping the flush.

As the battle for America’s political soul rages on, I’ve noticed one thing about the conservative movement (at least among those conservatives in the media) that really didn’t hit me until recently, with the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States. From Rush Limbaugh’s declaration that he wants the President to fail, because of his fear of what Obama’s policies will do to the country; to their opposition of gay marriage, out of fear for the “sanctity of marriage”; to their fierce opposition to the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, out of fear that terror suspects will be released into the general population; to their fear of calling waterboarding what it is (torture), to their opposition to an assault weapons ban, out of fear that the government will take away our right to bear arms. The recurring theme to all of their opposing positions is fear; I’ve just realized that conservatives are a bunch of sissies.

There’s no mistake that the Republican Party in America had been able to hold onto power in Washington for so many years by feeding the American people a steady diet of fear and paranoia. The mantra of “we are the only ones who can protect you from those who want to hurt you” has been a powerful weapon for the right wing in America, especially since 9/11; the Republican talking point that they “kept us safe” in the seven plus years since the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon has been a persuasive argument for the right, until of course you consider that 9/11 could have been prevented if anyone in the Bush White House had been paying attention, and that more Americans died under Bush / Cheney at the hands of terrorists than in any other time in American history. What I find interesting – and shocking – is that in their quest to hold onto their influence in the American political debate, they are revealing a remarkable amount of cowardice. Simply put: the majority of conservatives are chicken-shit.

Especially on the issues of national security – long seen to be an area dominated by Republicans – once rational arguments have given way to sheer paranoia, denial and outright fear. Take the conservative talking point that if Gitmo is closed and terror suspects are brought to the US, the american people will somehow be in grave danger. Forget the fact that the US houses some of the worlds most dangerous criminals like Charles Manson, the Unabomber and domestic terrorists Eric Rudolph and Timothy McVeigh and numerous foreign terrorists; America has some of the worlds most well fortified maximum security prisons, facilities that no one to date has escaped from. The notion that these places cannot hold suspected terrorists is not only ridiculous, it’s an insult to the thousands of men and women who work for the US prison system, as it says they’re not capable of doing their jobs. Even more than that, such sentiment reeks of cowardice.

You cannot, in my opinion, boast about how pro-America, “we kick ass”, shoot-first-ask-questions-later you are, but at the same time be afraid of the gay or lesbian couple who wants to marry, the person who hasn’t even been convicted of a crime going to a Supermax prison, or the state legislature who wants to ban the sale of weapons that were solely designed to kill people. You cannot be pro military, but at the same time support a war that was unnecessary and morally wrong, thus putting the lives and livelihoods of our military and their families at constant risk.

Granted, not all conservatives are cowards; recently, a conservative radio personality named Erich “Mancow” Muller subjected himself to waterboarding in order to “prove” that is wasn’t torture. Not only did he change his stance on the issue after going through it himself, saying that it was “absolutely torture”, he said that if he were waterboarded under interrogation he would have said anything to make the torture stop. The courage he showed by being waterboarded in order to back up his claim and his ability to admit he was wrong are traits that, sadly, the average American conservative are sorely lacking these days.

I guess having a spine doesn’t generally belong to conservative ideology.